Every lost answer becomes a brief your team can ship.
Dashboards tell you you're invisible. Cite AI hands your content team the evidence, the recommended format, and the outline to change it.
Evidence first, recommendation second
Before generating anything, Cite AI shows you the gap: what the AI actually answered, which competitor URLs it cited, which of your pages it read and skipped, and what the prompt intent was. You understand the loss before you invest in the fix.
- The AI answer that excluded you, verbatim
- Cited vs uncited competitor URLs for the prompt
- Your page’s extracted features and where they fall short
A brief your team can execute
The output is not auto-generated filler content — it’s a structured brief for the person who’ll do the work: the visibility gap explained in plain language, the recommended content format inferred from intent and competitor evidence, and an actionable outline.
- Recommended content type, with your override when you know better
- Structured sections your writer, developer, or agency can follow
- Copyable output built for handoff, not for pasting into a CMS blind
Then watch the needle
Because your panel re-runs weekly, you see the citation rate on the affected prompts before and after the fix ships. Not a promise of causation — evidence of movement you can put in front of a client or a boss.
- Week-over-week citation rate on the fixed prompt cluster
- Volatility context so noise doesn’t masquerade as progress
- Receipts: the new snippet, once the AI starts quoting it
The loop, closed
Citation tracking measures, the Site Auditdiagnoses, briefs fix — and the weekly re-run verifies. That's the difference between watching AI search and winning it.
Stop watching. Start fixing.
14-day free trial · No credit card required · 20 prompts & 1 project limit